About Us | Advertise | FAQ | Contact  | RSS Feed
Subscribe to this feed
ADVANCE for Physical Therapy and Rehab Medicine RSS Feed
Search
Login | Sign Up

Current Issue

Subscriptions are FREE to Qualified Professionals and Managers in PT and Rehab Medicine


Medicare ADVISOR Q&A

Frustrated with the "Standard of Practice"


View Comments (17)Print ArticleEmail Article

Question: I'm writing to you as I'm very frustrated with my employer's "standard of practice." Every day of the week, there are a minimum of 500 minutes of billable time under each therapist's name on the board to treat that day. Each therapist is required to be 95 percent productive and in order to do so, dovetail/concurrent treatments are necessary. I've questioned this practice to my rehab manager, who states it's appropriate to do so, and sees nothing wrong with this practice. I've been a therapist since 1995.  I remember the day PPS began and what that did to the company I was employed with. I know we are on a spiraling path, once again, and are "shooting ourselves in the foot" with this "standard of practice.

Just yesterday I was scheduled for 600 minutes. I work eight hours, so you do the math. It's absurd to get through your day in one piece, safely and morally, watching the way management dictates to the therapists what they will do, how much time they will see someone, regardless of what is appropriate. In fact, I see therapists working with up to 3 patients, "concurrently" and two out of the three are "resting" for half the time they are billing. This is wrong.  I am ethically and morally challenged daily and have no support in what I am saying.  I'm alone.

The other therapists are quiet, thankful they have a job. I need my job, yes. But I will not be part of a team who is tricking the system to get as much money as we can out of one person's Medicare A benefits, just to make money. I cannot.  I'm hoping that you can help me. This is happening in other places, I am certain. I just think these companies should be, no, must be stopped. How can we do it? Whatever happened to quality care, care driven by the discretion of the skilled therapist, not by the manager who is just money hungry? This is wrong. The patients are being taken advantage of. Acute rehab provides up to three hours/day of therapy for patients, we at the SNF are providing just under three hours a day; this is wrong. Each person must be seen for 75 minutes by both OT and PT and sometimes SLP. If the patients need that much therapy, why are they not still in their "rehab" centers and not SNF/LTC facilities? This is crooked and wrong and I will no longer be quiet on this. I'm hoping you can help me put a stop to this practice before it's too late.

Answer: We know your pain and can truly empathize with your concern. The main thing to remember is that you are not alone with your very valid concern. There are many more therapists who voice this concern to us. This is expressed to us many times through e-mails just like yours along with comments at our seminars. Unfortunately, even if reported, we have found out that the contractor or the government (in the role of the Office of Inspector General) usually does nothing as they consider the amount small for the amount of manpower it would take to investigate and prove.

The only thing that we can say at this moment is, be true to yourself and your profession and still take the time to report this practice, even if no follow-up occurs. Maybe eventually, if enough voices are heard, we will get the problem rectified.

CMS is now attempting to address this concern through the new guidelines for SNF that were published in the Federal Register in August and will become effective October 1 next year. In the preamble, they acknowledge that treatment of multiple patients at the same time is occurring in some facilities, and they indicate that they do not approve of the practice of taking advantage of Medicare's approval of "concurrent therapy being appropriate, but only at the discretion of the therapist, not the dictates of management".

The new guidelines identify that concurrent therapy of ONLY 2 patients will still be allowed, but it must be documented separately from the direct treatment time, just as we presently do with the use of group therapy. They also identified that if more than 2 patients were being treated at the same time, then NONE of the minutes for ANY of the patients can be counted.

With this regulation in place we, as therapists, will have the ability to refuse to perform treatment on more than 2 patients and, if demanded by management, should refuse to bill for that time, so as to be compliant with the Medicare regulation.

Disclaimer: The answers that we provide are based on Medicare guidelines for what is payable under the Medicare Part A and Part B Benefit. As always, the provider should be aware of the other regulations that might supersede the Medicare payment guidelines such as the State Practice Act and the State Administrative Code. In any scenario, the practitioner must go with the most stringent requirement in order to be compliant. The information provided is current as of the time of publication.

Pauline M. Franko, PT is owner of Encompass Consulting & Education, LLC; a consulting and education company specializing in Medicare Consulting, Compliance and Training, based in Tamarac, FL. The company's "Direction on Demand" service specializes in providing the rehabilitation professional with a clear, easy way to understand how to provide Medicare compliant services to their patients in the SNF and Outpatient settings. As an associate in Comprehensive Medicare Consultants, LLC, she is responsible for assisting with and directing compliance programs to Rehab Agencies. Danna Mullins is an associate and lecturer with Encompass. You may contact the authors through the Encompass website at www.encompassmedicare.com or by phone at 954-720-4087.


Medicare Advisor Archives
 

OMG, I feel validated. I am finishing a contract at a SNF and it is the most unbearable situation that I've ever work in during my 9 years as a PT. The manager at my facility got on my case because I refused to see a guy that had new symptoms from the weekend, of a stroke. I said that I was going to hold him from PT until the MD worked the patient up and/or sent him to the ER for a work up for possible CVA. This dude told me that I'm not a doctor, therefore, I can't make that call!!! I was like, "Are you kidding me?!" This patient, of course, was Medicare A. The OT that was seeing him had also withheld treatment and she went to him (the manager) to voice her concern for the patient and his new symptoms. He completely ripped her and basically said that she needs to keep seeing the guy until a Dr. says to stop!! I stood my ground and didn't see the guy until after his CT (which revealed a new CVA). The MD gave the okay to restart PT, as he deemed the CVA to now be stable. A couple weeks later, the guy appeared to have another decline, and again, our concern was voiced to the manager. His response was just as confrontational and unsupportive as the previous one. That was on a Friday. The patient died on Saturday. These companies only put the patient first when the patients needs don't negatively affect the bottom line. If that patient was a Medicaid patient, they wouldn't have cared if we held treatment!!! Very sad state of affairs!!

Mr. Williams October 29, 2009



Ive been in practice for over 25 years. I remember the days of pre PPS and the development of PPS. I recall the intensity of therapy delivered did not change much before PPS but instead now they are placed in catagories. The facilities are reimbursed based on minutes therapy is provided. Productivity is based on minutes the therapists provided in a given worked hours, we get paid by the facility.
Capturing 400 plus minutes is not all that difficult using concurrent and group strategies. Concurrent treatment will no longer take effect after 10/2010. My fear is the increased possibility of fraud in the attempts to capture minutes. It's difficult enough to find staff to treat Pts, because of therapists abuse of utilizing concurrent treatment we have found a way to place ourselves in a more difficult situation with expectations to still be productive and deliver maximal therapy time without compromising quality of care.

Tom October 15, 2009
IL



This is not a new problem. If more therapists and assistants would refuse then things would change. The big name brand corporations are notorious for scheduling 480+ minutes per therapist. Technically 450 is an 8 hour day and sometimes that is not possible to accomplish.
It is the bottom line $$$$ companies look for and in some places if you don't treat they have others waiting to take your place as soon as you leave. The new rules will help curb this overextension of the staff but then may use aides more frequently to boost profits.

jason October 13, 2009



Read all comments (17) >>


     

Email: *

Email, first name, comment and security code are required fields; all other fields are optional. With the exception of email, any information you provide will be displayed with your comment.

First * Last
Name:
Title Field Facility
Work:
City State
Location:

Comments: *
To prevent comment spam, please type the code you see below into the code field before submitting your comment. If you cannot read the numbers in the below image, reload the page to generate a new one.

Captcha
Enter the security code below: *

Fields marked with an * are required.

Your Specialty:

No Specialty Chosen

Set Specialty

 

Search Jobs

Zip

Go